Free Download
Naturally, comes to be also a great reason of you to spend your spare time for reading. It is different with other book that may need ore times to review. If you have been falling for this publication, you can specifically get it as one of the reading products as well as friends to come with spending the moment. After that, you can also get it as other excellent individuals discover and also read this publication. From this scenario, it is so clear that this publication is really needed to acquire as the referred publication due to the fact that it seems to be improving book.
Free Download
Do you require an aid to improve your life quality? Well, at first, we will ask you concerning your preferred routine. Do you like reading? Checking out can be an alternative method to boost the quality of life. Even this condition will rely on guide that you read you could begin loving reading by some certain publications. And to understand what we suggest below, we will reveal you the very best book to read today.
Spending the moment for checking out a publication will certainly give you the very helpful system. The system is not only regarding getting the expertise to relate to your certain condition. But, sometimes you well need fun point from guide. It could accompany you to run the moment meaningfully as well as well. Yeah, good time to review a publication, great time to have fun. And the existence of this publication will be so exact to be in yours.
As known, to complete this publication, you could not have to get it at the same time in a day. Doing the tasks along the day may make you feel so bored. If you try to require reading, you might choose to do other entertaining activities. But, among concepts we desire you to have this publication is that it will not make you really feel bored. Really feeling bored when reviewing will certainly be just unless you do not like guide. really uses what everyone desires.
So, when you have actually located guide and try to read it earlier, you can be one step forward to your close friends that have not review it yet. This publication does not offer you anything, yet it will provide you several points to discover and also act. When you have actually chosen to start checking out as your habit, you can enjoy as one of the material to read first. Reading will not be bound, actually. Reviewing is one's necessity that can look at any individual else. You can be part of the book enthusiasts and good readers to always review and end up the beneficial books.
Product details
File Size: 9838 KB
Print Length: 328 pages
Publisher: Stanford Business Books; 1 edition (September 2, 2015)
Publication Date: September 2, 2015
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B012IEEJXO
Text-to-Speech:
Enabled
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $ttsPopover = $('#ttsPop');
popover.create($ttsPopover, {
"closeButton": "false",
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "256",
"popoverLabel": "Text-to-Speech Popover",
"closeButtonLabel": "Text-to-Speech Close Popover",
"content": '
});
});
X-Ray:
Not Enabled
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $xrayPopover = $('#xrayPop_EE9E5BD4438211E98FA77D651A6C76F2');
popover.create($xrayPopover, {
"closeButton": "false",
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "256",
"popoverLabel": "X-Ray Popover ",
"closeButtonLabel": "X-Ray Close Popover",
"content": '
});
});
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Not Enabled
Screen Reader:
Supported
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $screenReaderPopover = $('#screenReaderPopover');
popover.create($screenReaderPopover, {
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "500",
"content": '
"popoverLabel": "The text of this e-book can be read by popular screen readers. Descriptive text for images (known as “ALT textâ€) can be read using the Kindle for PC app if the publisher has included it. If this e-book contains other types of non-text content (for example, some charts and math equations), that content will not currently be read by screen readers.",
"closeButtonLabel": "Screen Reader Close Popover"
});
});
Enhanced Typesetting:
Enabled
P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {
var $typesettingPopover = $('#typesettingPopover');
popover.create($typesettingPopover, {
"position": "triggerBottom",
"width": "256",
"content": '
"popoverLabel": "Enhanced Typesetting Popover",
"closeButtonLabel": "Enhanced Typesetting Close Popover"
});
});
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#336,818 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
Michael Storper et. al. have written an important book on the impact of the “new economy†on the growth and decline of major urban centers. It is destined to become a classic in regional economics and urban planning. The lead author is a professor of urban planning at UCLA. The authors use the Los Angeles and San Francisco metropolitan areas from 1970 to the present as a contrasting case study of how these two regional economies adapted to the transition from an industrial economy to an information economy. To Storper and his coauthors San Francisco succeeds because it has a far more adaptable and open source business ecology than the more enclosed corporate world of Los Angeles. Further San Francisco’s advantage is augmented by a more far seeing and cohesive business/government community that adopts public policies to enhance the information economy. To the authors it is these two critical factors more than the role of immigration and the 1990s collapse of aerospace in Los Angeles that account for the stunning differences in economic performance.To be sure these are valid points, but to my mind the authors over-state their case. Simply put the Los Angeles of 1970 suffered from the “tyranny of an installed base†and lacked the high gross margined businesses that could withstand the increasing tax and regulatory pressures coming from local government and the state of California.Now let’s look at the data. In 1969 the Los Angeles CMSA had approximately four million workers with 1.1 million of them engaged in manufacturing. At the same time the San Francisco CMSA had approximately 2.1 million workers with fewer than 400,000 engaged in manufacturing. Los Angeles was a manufacturing region, in fact the largest in the U.S.. If that is all you knew and you posited that the revolution in global trade would bring U.S. manufacturing to its knees in the coming decades, then you would predicted that San Francisco would easily outperform Los Angeles. By 2013 employment in Los Angeles increased to 7.6 million, but manufacturing jobs plummeted to 700,000. By contrast San Francisco employment increased to four million jobs while manufacturing barely declined to 360,000 jobs.What Los Angeles had was low margined traditional industrial, aerospace and apparel jobs, while San Francisco had much higher margined technology and specialized production jobs. To further prove my point the worst performing Bay area county was the one with the most traditional manufacturing jobs, Alameda County. Although people talk about the economic juggernaut of Silicon Valley few talk about the success of Alameda County’s major city, Oakland. Although it is an exaggeration, economically speaking the Los Angeles of 1970 looked a lot more like Oakland than San Jose.One of the advantages Silicon Valley had was a legacy of the politics of the 1960s. Recall that at that time the primary buyer of advanced electronics was the Department of Defense and Silicon Valley vigorously competed with Highway 128 in Boston and Texas for the business. With the Kennedy-Johnson years defense money flowed to Boston and Texas and not to Silicon Valley which did not have the near monopoly position that Los Angeles had in defense oriented production. So what did Silicon Valley producers do to respond? They went after the commercial market and became far more adaptable than their competitors. Thus, when the aerospace recession of 1969-76 hit, Silicon Valley was prepared.The authors duly note that Los Angeles was a major technology center in 1970, but most of that technology was based on aerospace. Unlike northern California where most technology enterprises were small and entry was easy, the ecology of the aerospace industry is based on large units with difficult entry. While job mobility in aerospace is high, for example I spent two years in the aerospace industry and worked at two large firms, capital mobility is not. You didn’t see venture capital funding aerospace start-ups.Another way in which the tyranny of an installed base affected Los Angeles was the presence of a huge Hispanic population in the area. This meant that when the manufacturing base collapsed, the political structure had to respond to the loss of employment opportunities for that population. The response was to beef up the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach which made them the entrepot for the flood of goods coming in from Asia. To the authors this activity increased middle and lower income employment, but were nowhere near the high jobs being created in San Francisco. What choice did the political establishment have?This review doesn’t do justice to the very serious economics work that the authors present. I just wanted to point out to future readers to not completely buy in to the authors’ thesis. Initial conditions are very important and cannot be discounted. However, the authors offer much food for thought and demonstrate that public policy in this area is very difficult to make.
As a lifelong resident of California -- both North, South and for a few years in the Middle -- I have observed how "LA" and the "City" (terms we use in San Francisco) have grown apart over the past 50+ years. The reasons are many and the consequences clear. Rise and Fall of Urban Economies (read, Los Angeles versus San Francisco) is well researched and documented -- an excellent way to share with others what they will find in the two cities and why they might prefer one over the other, starting with the obvious: Hollywood/cinema versus Silicon Valley/high tech, or immigrant Latino influence/LA versus demographic-shift Millennials/SF. Even water/drought affects the two cities differently. There are a number of factors that make great cities rise (e.g. San Francisco) and fall (Detroit) over a lifetime. This retired professor often holds "seminars" (lubricated by coffee in AM or wine in PM) for Millennials -- where/why/which environment do you want to launch a career, raise a family, accumulate a fortune (or not), settle down (or not) -- and this book is part of the canon, along with "Regional Advantage" by Annalee Saxenian (but that is another cup or glass). Recommended for data-driven decision makers. 5-stars.
Very interesting comparison of LA and San Francisco. And very informative for a LA resident. I appreciated the data analysis as someone with two graduate degrees in urban planning, but the comparisons of corporations' behaviors in the two metropolitan areas was even more interesting.
The "Rise and Fall" of urban areas deals with an important issue in the country today: why are some urban areas becoming more successful and generating more economic wealth and other are stagnating or declining. What makes this book helpful is the presentation of strategies and actionable items that leaders in urban regions can use. Most importantly these approaches can be undertaken and controlled within the region and do not rely on outside help.Mark PisanoProfessor of Practice of Public AdministrationSol Price School of PolicyUniversity of Southern California
You have to ask 'how did SF beat LA?' Hi-tech? Sour dough? Better schools? More counties? This book answers it.
PDF
EPub
Doc
iBooks
rtf
Mobipocket
Kindle
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar